Previous  Next

7-90-803. Statement of foreign entity authority to transact business or conduct activities.

Statute text

(1) A foreign entity may cause to be delivered to the secretary of state, for filing pursuant to part 3 of this article, a statement of foreign entity authority stating:

(a) Its true name and its assumed entity name, if any;

(b) The jurisdiction under the law of which it is formed;

(c) The form of the entity as that form is recognized by the jurisdiction under the law of which the entity is formed;

(d) (Deleted by amendment, L. 2004, p. 1493, 238, effective July 1, 2004.)

(e) The principal office address of its principal office;

(f) The registered agent name and registered agent address of its registered agent; and

(g) The date it commenced or expects to commence transacting business or conducting activities in this state.

(h) (Deleted by amendment, L. 2004, p. 1493, 238, effective July 1, 2004.)

History

Source: L. 2003: Entire part added, p. 2307, 217, effective July 1, 2004. L. 2004: (1)(c), (1)(d), and (1)(h) amended, p. 1493, 238, effective July 1. L. 2006: (1)(b) amended, p. 876, 61, effective July 1.

Annotations

 

ANNOTATION

Annotations

Law reviews. For article, "1959 Amendments to the Colorado Corporation Code", see 36 Dicta 489 (1959). For article, "1984 Revisions to the Colorado Corporation Code: Effective March 1984", which discusses elimination of filing requirements for foreign corporations, see 13 Colo. Law. 993 (1984).

Annotator's note. Since 7-90-803 is similar to 7-115-103 as it existed prior to the 2003 repeal and reenactment of article 115 of title 7, to 7-9-108 as it existed prior to the 1993 recodification of the "Colorado Business Corporation Act", articles 101 to 117 of title 7, and to laws antecedent thereto, a case construing a predecessor provision has been included in the annotations to this section.

The secretary of state has the right to treat a report as not filed and refuse to file it until the fee is paid and until then it would not be filed, notwithstanding its delivery into his possession. Sherman v. Credit Fin. Corp., 78 Colo. 330, 241 P. 722 (1925).

And the secretary of state is not obliged to treat a check, as payment of the fee, even if properly endorsed. Sherman v. Credit Fin. Corp., 78 Colo. 330, 241 P. 722 (1925).